{"id":"W2438216519","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.001","title":"Compatibility between dental adhesive systems and dual-polymerizing composite resins","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Composite number; Adhesive; Materials science; Composite material; Polymerization; Molar; Resin composite; Dental bonding; Bond strength; Polymer; Dentistry; Layer (electronics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004416378,0.0001829726,0.0004468679,0.0001064198,0.000181487,0.000286163,0.000193888,0.0001183212,0.0000840318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006885137,0.0001211382,0.0001275647,0.00008786156,0.0002303723,0.0003718532,0.0001188803,0.0001505811,0.00009864516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001030421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005512078,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004809226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001838412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998002,0.0002018321,0.000872215,0.0002077272,0.0004774473,0.000238794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985082,0.0001355889,0.000746889,0.0002389815,0.0001606087,0.0002097143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001237329,0.0001637385,0.4296945,0.0001566108,0.0001523605,0.001309614,0.0001187859,0.00000146402,0.5653507,0.0003261536,0.0008564309,0.001745838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002299027,0.0002959713,0.9088454,0.0009869903,0.000183257,0.01568416,0.0004931351,0.000005426929,0.0691497,0.0003243,0.001404849,0.00032776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951869,0.0009403101,0.0005898337,0.0001053229,0.002612483,0.0001861905,0.0001958611,0.00002123646,0.0001619115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985248,0.00003925887,0.000189338,0.0000126024,0.0004388554,0.000003334085,0.000006598869,0.00002374377,0.0007614369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.496201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4939872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02447352902248306,"score_gpt":0.2876221334747372,"score_spread":0.2631486044522541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}