{"id":"W2439077617","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2016.214","title":"P.113 Validation and standardization of cerebral vasospasm grading on CT angiography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada); Toronto Public Health; Calgary Laboratory Services","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Digital subtraction angiography; Vasospasm; Grading (engineering); Subarachnoid hemorrhage; Angiography; Radiology; Cerebral vasospasm; Grading scale; Cerebral angiography; Nuclear medicine; Internal medicine; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05035033,0.0005723924,0.0004107683,0.003510456,0.0005372574,0.001854811,0.001396211,0.0006879436,0.001363714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1236321,0.0002953973,0.0008222563,0.002235731,0.001494011,0.001176904,0.001780127,0.0007276856,0.0007604868],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008464048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001289054,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002022262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001789458,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9738328,0.01365554,0.004239989,0.001482477,0.006256552,0.0005326048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8869057,0.04106893,0.01411965,0.01408072,0.04250835,0.001316583],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005028411,0.0001377765,0.9160694,0.0003200004,0.0003281449,0.0001100991,0.001380014,0.001375467,0.002629208,0.0007541937,0.002357202,0.07403559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006631175,0.0007219918,0.9774063,0.0003046172,0.0001969598,0.0004979803,0.000798032,0.009681896,0.004416605,0.0007519916,0.005113421,0.00004392366],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9305645,0.001141148,0.04630578,0.0005082199,0.0005711038,0.002291881,0.00136089,0.0003936509,0.01686287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824154,0.0002067481,0.01550704,0.0000733716,0.00008648742,0.0004646838,0.0007911918,0.00006403052,0.0003911172],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05035033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2662811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02890592976619405,"score_gpt":0.2649305181367433,"score_spread":0.2360245883705493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}