{"id":"W2441517775","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2016.06.002","title":"Regional climate change trends and uncertainty analysis using extreme indices: A case study of Hamilton, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate Risk Management","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; McMaster University","funders":"Environment Canada; Climate Extremes; Met Office","keywords":"Downscaling; Precipitation; Environmental science; Climatology; Climate change; Range (aeronautics); Climate extremes; Climate model; Extreme value theory; Meteorology; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007341996,0.0002359183,0.0003717846,0.0002227481,0.0002991101,0.00002555232,0.0001963517,0.00004516286,0.0004734298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005876486,0.0001723559,0.00008372022,0.0008083555,0.000153728,0.0002134232,0.0005500187,0.00006440151,0.000004385648],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004029124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006303603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5586928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7767004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977657,0.0001635123,0.0004793552,0.0006322755,0.0004541672,0.0005049513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988492,0.0000893582,0.0003331309,0.0005678018,0.00001324917,0.0001473096],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001340193,0.000753587,0.9263043,0.0001262989,0.0006942425,0.0009860002,0.004152793,0.01210473,0.00004356821,0.0001808392,0.0001128038,0.05440678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006283058,0.0006726811,0.7578797,0.0002092902,0.008369962,0.0001926718,0.03484812,0.1852472,0.00001161507,0.0004458778,0.004211604,0.001628239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979439,0.00003961504,0.0001379434,0.00006769743,0.00005002406,0.0004158991,0.0002149395,0.00002589739,0.001104058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980389,0.001373183,0.000373769,0.00008314666,0.00001541602,0.0000564058,0.00001003781,0.00001466268,0.00003448058],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2180077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.702847,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06256878309640583,"score_gpt":0.2697905032622158,"score_spread":0.20722172016581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}