{"id":"W2441517775","doi":"10.1016/j.crm.2016.06.002","title":"Regional climate change trends and uncertainty analysis using extreme indices: A case study of Hamilton, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate Risk Management","topic":"Climate variability and models","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto and Region Conservation Authority; McMaster University","funders":"Environment Canada; Climate Extremes; Met Office","keywords":"Downscaling; Precipitation; Environmental science; Climatology; Climate change; Range (aeronautics); Climate extremes; Climate model; Extreme value theory; Meteorology; Statistics; Mathematics; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004938415,0.000281761,0.0002149437,0.001100298,0.001867863,0.001342178,0.0009230363,0.0003007591,0.0009278436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00159702,0.0001666097,0.0003839705,0.004903635,0.0007235707,0.0003533628,0.0005898426,0.0004170637,0.00006553716],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04384575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985983,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.00005885041,0.00001735841,0.000055836,0.0002028231,0.0001673783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989165,0.0001833815,0.00008608364,0.00004144717,0.0006571637,0.0001154373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002908075,0.0001648776,0.7805555,0.0003308112,0.0003908101,0.005849163,0.004234494,0.09411207,0.002694177,0.01335288,0.01530254,0.08272176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006298227,0.0000908814,0.8582,0.0001320945,0.0002149902,0.000515248,0.0145139,0.1002603,0.001355229,0.002468487,0.02204568,0.0001402739],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761379,0.0005089916,0.001660481,0.0008664632,0.000008844589,0.000147957,0.00499997,0.0000630528,0.01560625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930435,0.0004493205,0.002430996,0.00008714305,0.000004042124,0.00002630676,0.001438682,0.0000171197,0.002502786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04384575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3181246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06256878309640583,"score_gpt":0.2697905032622158,"score_spread":0.20722172016581,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}