{"id":"W2443310345","doi":"10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001191","title":"Fuzzy Arithmetic Risk Analysis Approach to Determine Construction Project Contingency","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Construction Engineering and Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fuzzy logic; Defuzzification; Fuzzy number; Computer science; Contingency table; Contingency; Fuzzy set; Probabilistic logic; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002472528,0.001143777,0.0006751775,0.003001743,0.0007166659,0.001839824,0.001180578,0.0006799741,0.003781218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004721924,0.000395016,0.001308471,0.001408963,0.0009531838,0.001818468,0.001059914,0.001747162,0.0004200469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001380893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001935452,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003111698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003078756,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977238,0.0006907659,0.0001261306,0.0002632033,0.001092164,0.0001040409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984661,0.0008187643,0.0001916171,0.0001006155,0.0003866724,0.00003620107],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008544251,0.00005977182,0.001563749,0.0002184516,0.0001300983,0.0001588983,0.0003843434,0.6857255,0.005314865,0.1595699,0.001807043,0.1449818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001136776,0.0000790817,0.0006965477,0.0000441569,0.00003013486,0.0001102148,0.00009355409,0.9399527,0.002476555,0.05208414,0.004372432,0.0000492217],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004662387,0.0001100584,0.9919162,0.0000509998,0.00001797297,0.00004286896,0.00003023996,0.00008998819,0.003079203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3309754,0.0004043927,0.6649368,0.00005733933,0.00005560419,0.0002255036,0.0001349375,0.00005613861,0.003153819],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003781218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01307619,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03038955228908361,"score_gpt":0.2815618999536438,"score_spread":0.2511723476645602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}