{"id":"W2443825507","doi":"10.1108/jhom-05-2013-0103","title":"Fit for purpose? Introducing a rational priority setting approach into a community care setting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Health Organization and Management","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Health Services; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia; Vancouver Coastal Health","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Originality; Psychology; Management science; Quality (philosophy); Knowledge management; Computer science; Process management; Social psychology; Business; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05592901,0.0006788294,0.0005332217,0.002462722,0.008095438,0.01026507,0.003440815,0.002517142,0.007825109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06572173,0.0007907448,0.0009192217,0.001463672,0.01077794,0.00837058,0.009331032,0.00521473,0.0008012296],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02046373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05386369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03762088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1164474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9409105,0.05044532,0.001213324,0.001563358,0.003257379,0.002610204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9602296,0.02393472,0.001899499,0.002779143,0.004188951,0.006968053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003246358,0.001613112,0.02701393,0.002114203,0.0001216312,0.001475112,0.2055927,0.002907504,0.003067582,0.2522894,0.02802696,0.4754533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005545804,0.00181388,0.02427278,0.004890238,0.0001976159,0.00165647,0.3557962,0.01246552,0.003345674,0.2988036,0.2957229,0.0004805624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2604477,0.002534983,0.3701904,0.2353128,0.001901165,0.007565439,0.0002688051,0.001189118,0.1205896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6178514,0.0008645739,0.3655697,0.007283546,0.0001247509,0.002353057,0.00006473673,0.0001504807,0.005737783],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05592901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2957844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1639813058683167,"score_gpt":0.3971866833892112,"score_spread":0.2332053775208945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}