{"id":"W2444102461","doi":"10.1080/00048402.2016.1182196","title":"The Relatively Infinite Value of the Environment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Infinity; Value (mathematics); Obligation; Skepticism; Mathematical economics; Absolute (philosophy); Intrinsic value (animal ethics); Expected value; Expected utility hypothesis; Outcome (game theory); Value of life; Relative value; Epistemology; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Law; Environmental ethics; Political science; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006333629,0.00009180253,0.000192487,0.00005114495,0.00009829746,0.00001133419,0.0003286043,0.00005085375,0.0002281379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005976087,0.00004928945,0.0002031879,0.00004695656,0.0002443421,0.0002148008,0.00004738859,0.0001262287,0.0002071645],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001174213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001164042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002338874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.276697e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989129,0.00003521621,0.0007583424,0.0001045007,0.00005795524,0.0001310372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984785,0.00009981082,0.001129958,0.0002339147,0.000007652698,0.00005018178],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002130019,0.00006087731,0.4429336,0.000005424874,0.000136882,0.000001179107,0.0002846386,0.0003932978,0.0004551603,0.5532786,0.0003795594,0.002049515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006174853,0.0001454563,0.6152939,0.00004421774,0.00001304699,0.00001128683,0.00003777398,0.00001331952,0.0007946297,0.3729207,0.01002235,0.00008583454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662955,0.0005448174,0.0008404895,0.0172534,0.0004938039,0.0001299892,0.00004053675,0.000002264032,0.01439918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986051,0.0003211984,0.0002028324,0.0000650388,0.000125893,0.000001664374,1.943816e-7,0.00001065994,0.0006674523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1803579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.266275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06397755741865334,"score_gpt":0.2065247715214642,"score_spread":0.1425472141028108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}