{"id":"W2460214957","doi":"10.1007/s10531-016-1167-x","title":"Community ecological modelling as an alternative to physiographic classifications for marine conservation planning","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biodiversity and Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","keywords":"Ecology; Multidimensional scaling; Biodiversity; Habitat; Environmental science; Indicator species; Abiotic component; Community structure; Marine protected area; Community; Geography; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001867207,0.0000722421,0.00006914208,0.00003252568,0.0005945711,0.00003082808,0.0001113631,0.00005174296,0.001393069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004425372,0.00006014553,0.00002557972,0.0001352585,0.0001339042,0.0002828087,0.0001223596,0.0000448446,0.0001354476],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000494236,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001756541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005829494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994743,0.00006667162,0.00008911324,0.0001606647,0.00009304568,0.0001161729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996169,0.00008897995,0.00005814903,0.0001123128,0.00003951661,0.00008417615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003656893,0.0003976283,0.9504899,0.00001342799,0.00002484977,0.000001321886,0.001615142,0.0001668037,0.01403402,0.01118809,0.01847663,0.003226523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006018724,0.0002170858,0.9730362,0.000008477517,0.0000178505,0.000001341456,0.002417885,0.002949057,0.0005466695,0.003002272,0.01704761,0.000153623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9797639,0.000001242869,0.009006614,0.01007076,0.0000366085,0.0002394481,0.0001688188,0.00004133319,0.0006712569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971079,0.00001776972,0.0004419511,0.002082935,0.000008592355,0.00002247662,0.0002133833,0.000001769118,0.0001031903],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02254639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1420100851304115,"score_gpt":0.2783940372766601,"score_spread":0.1363839521462485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}