{"id":"W2460915810","doi":"10.1017/s175173111600121x","title":"An evaluation of the accuracy and precision of methane prediction equations for beef cattle fed high-forage and high-grain diets","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"animal","topic":"Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","keywords":"Concordance correlation coefficient; Forage; Beef cattle; Outlier; Mathematics; Animal science; Principal component analysis; Statistics; Animal feed; Dry matter; Agronomy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01348233,0.000658877,0.0008803756,0.001430262,0.0003377044,0.001251293,0.0009245063,0.0007227702,0.0003611023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02877708,0.0004331752,0.001342414,0.00135812,0.0002572043,0.0008090051,0.0006047275,0.0004168124,0.0002022337],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008329314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001138401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01139273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007749187,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953924,0.001994494,0.000635976,0.0008927188,0.0009531141,0.0001312918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976355,0.01634893,0.002266555,0.001316507,0.003564644,0.0001482238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025,0.0005514327,0.718505,0.0006150673,0.002504135,0.0001620492,0.0004521105,0.09272294,0.0121886,0.0005044413,0.0006709978,0.1686233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001987053,0.001761716,0.4493749,0.000129976,0.0008676481,0.0002443392,0.0002300247,0.5303853,0.01489407,0.0004127287,0.001397117,0.0001035007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730387,0.001249786,0.02395857,0.000051212,0.00001832218,0.00005464283,0.0008757931,0.0001801542,0.0005727636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765702,0.0004231118,0.02120904,0.00002142453,0.000008339169,0.00003116035,0.001495593,0.00002828461,0.0002127684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01348233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07130224,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05110668583042813,"score_gpt":0.3004844016547025,"score_spread":0.2493777158242744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}