{"id":"W2461028768","doi":"10.5539/ijel.v6n4p136","title":"A Case Study on Characters in Pride and Prejudice: From Perspectives of Speech Act Theory and Conversational Implicature","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of English Linguistics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Guangdong University of Foreign Studies","keywords":"Pride; Implicature; Enlightenment; Prejudice (legal term); Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Cooperative principle; Criticism; Psychology; Sociology; Pragmatics; Social psychology; Epistemology; Literature; Philosophy; Art; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004031677,0.00009256669,0.0001600872,0.0001655,0.00003654109,0.00009018961,0.0001969461,0.00002946508,0.0001043171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009163161,0.00006339851,0.00003355599,0.00001458234,0.0002308298,0.0001179943,0.00005800762,0.0001746919,5.375145e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005102988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006593454,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008954333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001688474,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991201,0.0001140506,0.0003361937,0.0001058843,0.0002597283,0.00006407488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947035,0.001083393,0.0003584791,0.0001179792,0.003698669,0.00003800753],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000725122,0.0006185485,0.02228471,0.000008965477,0.0006302824,0.0007847314,0.4061317,0.000002829753,0.0001119132,0.5656064,0.0002849537,0.002809912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005266594,0.0006304837,0.05805228,0.0004404123,0.0001596416,0.000125854,0.87898,0.000007311829,0.0003851458,0.03664307,0.01896665,0.0003425784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898906,0.0002087546,0.000008144331,0.0001314703,0.001001443,0.00008770901,0.0001275523,0.000006419327,0.008537866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969738,0.0001041736,0.00008507852,0.00004121747,0.00272599,0.00000170205,0.000003160329,0.000008689292,0.00005626529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5289633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991831,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02598455580310458,"score_gpt":0.3125403208734022,"score_spread":0.2865557650702976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}