{"id":"W2461066995","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2012-0465","title":"Evaluating the effect of seismic surveys on fish — the efficacy of different exposure metrics to explain disturbance","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine animal studies overview","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Havforskningsinstituttet","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Sound exposure; Sound (geography); Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Simple (philosophy); Sound energy; Sound propagation; Energy (signal processing); Norwegian; Ecology; Statistics; Fishery; Geology; Acoustics; Mathematics; Biology; Oceanography; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01139134,0.001160159,0.0006263924,0.001852107,0.0002792022,0.0008994687,0.0006763525,0.0006637372,0.0009277562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02851835,0.0003483734,0.001334135,0.001023442,0.00113112,0.001725316,0.001398969,0.0005130554,0.0001184021],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001165588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005412953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01075556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01226609,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996514,0.001821434,0.0003658827,0.0005447834,0.0005480495,0.0002058713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614503,0.03022358,0.004060559,0.001859915,0.001697026,0.0007087082],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00130197,0.0001810682,0.8372666,0.0002763985,0.00105227,0.000248348,0.0007386142,0.1147851,0.01095812,0.0008379898,0.0002030002,0.03215042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034275,0.001794035,0.7908081,0.0000528295,0.0003366543,0.0001694343,0.0006515474,0.1953256,0.008523614,0.0014921,0.0007146778,0.00009707346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9629835,0.0002361028,0.03527477,0.0001067313,0.00001797713,0.0001035128,0.0002869398,0.0001286761,0.0008618172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928128,0.00006532743,0.006627784,0.00002307662,0.000005553721,0.00003192577,0.0002074305,0.00002938978,0.0001966634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01139134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0602439,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03516594282525916,"score_gpt":0.2619277261032229,"score_spread":0.2267617832779638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}