{"id":"W246160853","doi":"10.1080/07350015.2015.1044008","title":"Treatment Effects With Unobserved Heterogeneity: A Set Identification Approach","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business and Economic Statistics","topic":"Advanced Causal Inference Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Econometrics; Average treatment effect; Identification (biology); Outcome (game theory); Covariate; Set (abstract data type); Panel data; Treatment effect; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Medicine; Estimator; Mathematical economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03228901,0.001830891,0.004311254,0.004453009,0.001342605,0.003590014,0.00609729,0.004353655,0.01220831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08774871,0.001976535,0.00489412,0.003277346,0.003511689,0.004891005,0.005063317,0.00777906,0.001032056],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002977897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003199147,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003552243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002463477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9792944,0.0149739,0.0005893437,0.002094912,0.002200156,0.0008474046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8903432,0.09691992,0.004462254,0.005460864,0.002051824,0.0007619412],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008719012,0.0001263553,0.001836431,0.0002206793,0.000636965,0.0002228609,0.0003787449,0.133635,0.000292961,0.8324757,0.001946744,0.02814031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005404759,0.00004930405,0.0004541662,0.00008201436,0.000114988,0.00005313725,0.00005360751,0.3666549,0.00022234,0.6302357,0.001986918,0.00003886295],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002853292,0.0002311237,0.9940981,0.0007179183,0.00004238504,0.000120768,0.0002046621,0.00008139708,0.001650424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4593451,0.002513602,0.5148737,0.001847932,0.0007878295,0.003823896,0.001493564,0.0001941945,0.01512023],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03228901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1707627,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.19657782441177,"score_gpt":0.3694869541265559,"score_spread":0.1729091297147859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}