{"id":"W2464262215","doi":"","title":"GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS OF A PARAMETRIC DENSITY FUNCTIONS: MONTE CARLO SIMULATION STUDIES","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Statistical Research","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Monte Carlo method; Goodness of fit; Mathematics; Kurtosis; Estimator; Empirical distribution function; Statistics; Parametric statistics; Kernel density estimation; Statistical hypothesis testing; Divergence (linguistics); Kullback–Leibler divergence; Probability density function; Applied mathematics; Statistical physics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003835383,0.0001254174,0.0006851205,0.0004334912,0.00009808637,0.00001484018,0.0001769174,0.00008117624,0.00005915838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08268197,0.00009371233,0.00009501507,0.0006526776,0.0004326183,0.0001698553,0.00009899069,0.0006056163,0.000004983155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001595432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001651666,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001395132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001797974,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964417,0.0005535935,0.001121768,0.0001659796,0.00138022,0.0003368039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604313,0.0353131,0.0004299368,0.0002164266,0.003404518,0.0002047384],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002299595,0.002884849,0.002372129,0.002077613,0.0009058051,0.0002141595,0.001839469,0.08447877,0.002050252,0.4504052,0.00553192,0.4449403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001255495,0.001774947,0.005970047,0.0004153954,0.0001930737,0.00003204024,0.001251266,0.09544522,0.0006984573,0.8923043,0.0004712889,0.0001884693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1501282,0.0006802087,0.8485694,0.0001423687,0.00007554336,0.0001921683,0.00008556062,0.000005352443,0.0001212213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5794476,0.0001223539,0.4202246,0.000004733412,0.00007329552,0.0000026731,2.190926e-7,0.00001049899,0.000114104],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4447518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.925045,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6489648671705567,"score_gpt":0.6363543210358107,"score_spread":0.01261054613474599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}