{"id":"W2464648297","doi":"10.29173/cais531","title":"Has the Web Really Contributed to a Decline in the Scholarly Quality of Undergraduate Citation Behaviour?: A Canadian Case Study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Quality (philosophy); The Internet; Library science; Work (physics); Politics; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Medical education; Engineering; Medicine; World Wide Web; Law; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040997,0.0001431454,0.000275095,0.0001971056,0.0004931528,0.003833349,0.001365858,0.0001065836,0.00002002043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03370243,0.00009186206,0.00006906371,0.001421907,0.0004196144,0.005207534,0.000117023,0.0002622376,0.000002313223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001877096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002511591,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.506254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5695603,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978293,0.0003232621,0.0006152759,0.0002080627,0.0007085489,0.0003155138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9484384,0.0004178112,0.0006884568,0.000221208,0.05007523,0.0001588792],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005525329,0.0003280139,0.4813316,0.00002719033,0.00004004904,0.000002130247,0.4812011,0.000006040969,0.001421945,0.030064,0.003890063,0.001632614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005948783,0.000254395,0.5719834,0.00006572702,0.00005774608,0.000008585113,0.4120554,0.00005852992,0.0003192558,0.007095813,0.007338135,0.0001681775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127901,0.00001990553,0.000004345862,0.08343511,0.0001006525,0.001450836,0.00009190914,0.00001126396,0.002095841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99867,0.00001365029,0.00007399032,0.000848135,0.00005604251,0.0001588152,0.000003583846,0.000008039751,0.0001677138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09065174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972008,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06069730929853405,"score_gpt":0.3394307654894141,"score_spread":0.27873345619088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}