{"id":"W2464773004","doi":"10.1080/14724049.2016.1194850","title":"Short-stop visitation in Shark Bay World Heritage Area: an importance–performance analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecotourism","topic":"Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions","keywords":"Visitor pattern; World heritage; Natural heritage; Tourism; Destinations; Nature reserve; Phone; Geography; Environmental resource management; Nature tourism; Ecotourism; Marketing; Business; Environmental planning; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003068981,0.0001361205,0.0003908615,0.001260251,0.000201808,0.0001408355,0.0006711039,0.00009724589,0.001614576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003438152,0.0001004555,0.0002288201,0.001435494,0.0001526783,0.002153458,0.00005021487,0.0003038578,0.00003625883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003885776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002167861,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001532628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009070479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973657,0.0002539516,0.0006286979,0.0002242414,0.001033454,0.0004939208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985139,0.0001993808,0.0003543377,0.0002536525,0.000347029,0.0003316613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001453623,0.0002630282,0.964175,0.000009062097,0.000287723,0.0009179716,0.003297625,0.0001596192,0.0006612181,0.0005084767,0.005903292,0.02367163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009369587,0.0002526634,0.9839389,0.0001439392,0.0001627959,0.000004877757,0.003915972,0.0002591418,0.0004051335,0.001598392,0.008047163,0.0003340363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798948,0.0001232704,0.00009172851,0.003033771,0.0002308321,0.0001462782,0.0000052715,0.00001686748,0.01645721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950373,0.0003748423,0.0007187562,0.00006593982,0.0006419882,0.000004267508,0.000001255692,0.00001331073,0.003142331],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02333759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992981,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03947630675107747,"score_gpt":0.3403244908483864,"score_spread":0.300848184097309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}