{"id":"W2464883340","doi":"","title":"Looking the Gift Horse in the Mouth: An Examination of the Canadian Approach to Criminal Restitution in Case of Sexual Violence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Damages; Law; Conviction; Legislation; Political science; Statutory law; Government (linguistics); Criminal law; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004991647,0.0003917629,0.0004617506,0.007221559,0.03028451,0.007072637,0.00396648,0.003983465,0.00497625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01337326,0.0004508866,0.0008445285,0.009800488,0.01717316,0.002258355,0.00389753,0.005075539,0.0002633315],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2151879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3280358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998857,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99049,0.001583927,0.0002321476,0.0004087764,0.003641149,0.003644123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934149,0.001565238,0.0004455365,0.0001402648,0.003110505,0.001323548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007949088,0.0001499952,0.04728422,0.0006857291,0.00005244259,0.004157648,0.1998462,0.001222657,0.0006709156,0.5783002,0.0553682,0.1121823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003851637,0.00007812693,0.1987755,0.002135784,0.0002011855,0.002413013,0.3677603,0.001683753,0.0003567551,0.0222934,0.4040163,0.0002473873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2420975,0.02740093,0.00225316,0.1620481,0.0006602164,0.0003564723,0.0003315698,0.00004495636,0.5648071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249638,0.02181726,0.002598636,0.01906077,0.0001645344,0.00007203995,0.0001320804,0.00005268359,0.03113815],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2151879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9102708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02395331517953872,"score_gpt":0.297366625832685,"score_spread":0.2734133106531463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}