{"id":"W2464960146","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.60","title":"Community Review: A little regulatory pluralism with your counter-hegemonic advocacy? Blending analytical frames to construct joined-up food policy in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Construct (python library); Explanatory power; Hegemony; Process (computing); Food policy; Theme (computing); Political science; Frame (networking); Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Geography; Law; Agriculture; Telecommunications; Food security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003571331,0.0003573269,0.0005423788,0.00009453596,0.0004634962,0.00005021776,0.0003813778,0.00008842201,0.00006217126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003199132,0.0001575515,0.00007678754,0.001031072,0.0001577043,0.0002191765,0.00007995209,0.0002390462,0.000004348481],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004867747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008840607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.958371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999205,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977648,0.0002723659,0.0004545877,0.0004214102,0.0001834648,0.0009033267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982901,0.0003156547,0.0001500551,0.0001833346,0.0002659294,0.0007949831],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000646871,0.000509528,0.4057906,0.004784419,0.007255364,0.001076471,0.05771805,0.000107654,0.06421582,0.06088722,0.1241308,0.2728772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001673922,0.003175949,0.8079751,0.008282007,0.0002922545,0.000321962,0.07751172,0.000007222614,0.001734993,0.0004163216,0.0967657,0.001842914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9725567,0.003090912,2.272258e-7,0.02289575,0.0001467822,0.0005208164,0.0005508184,0.00002790554,0.0002101679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963161,0.0008532233,0.00002342819,0.002320329,0.0001402591,0.0000671683,0.00006995242,0.000006927426,0.0002025771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4021845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989524,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03072650279157401,"score_gpt":0.2311927572458743,"score_spread":0.2004662544543003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}