{"id":"W2464960146","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.60","title":"Community Review: A little regulatory pluralism with your counter-hegemonic advocacy? Blending analytical frames to construct joined-up food policy in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Construct (python library); Explanatory power; Hegemony; Process (computing); Food policy; Theme (computing); Political science; Frame (networking); Public administration; Public relations; Computer science; Geography; Law; Agriculture; Telecommunications; Food security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07091855,0.0006016326,0.001555814,0.006312028,0.01981968,0.02419007,0.005036402,0.005611029,0.00402193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1210292,0.0005388429,0.0009060861,0.01062406,0.02310946,0.008051557,0.006100878,0.005900064,0.0004747472],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1373809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4227726,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8776944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9367273,"domain_scores_codex":[0.914234,0.03707328,0.002755439,0.004563969,0.03225816,0.009115124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8567369,0.04058719,0.006311045,0.005971594,0.07694753,0.0134457],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001350024,0.00009096527,0.006808165,0.004623599,0.0003199662,0.0008327655,0.06182505,0.001194818,0.0009973688,0.3301345,0.3722315,0.2208063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004631589,0.00003809569,0.004219473,0.003475944,0.0001271225,0.0001175818,0.03096422,0.0004094313,0.0003261364,0.02681842,0.9333736,0.00008372938],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02216117,0.07798479,0.006242505,0.7911934,0.006211574,0.0004840064,0.0002892055,0.0001496135,0.09528385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.773145,0.05680137,0.01621548,0.1168664,0.002291215,0.0006439419,0.0003188701,0.0002738413,0.03344388],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.862619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03072650279157401,"score_gpt":0.2311927572458743,"score_spread":0.2004662544543003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}