{"id":"W2465387192","doi":"10.1139/er-2016-0015","title":"Review and evaluation of a chiral enrichment model for chlordane enantiomers in the environment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Chlordane; Environmental chemistry; Heptachlor; Enantiomer; Environmental science; Pesticide; Trophic level; Chemistry; Ecology; Dieldrin; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008251073,0.001022993,0.001398367,0.001076453,0.0002789534,0.001116387,0.001205363,0.001026642,0.001606605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00147968,0.0004124435,0.001572301,0.00136882,0.0002315643,0.0008218842,0.0004156941,0.0004740432,0.0006776994],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009752148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001429935,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006399657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00392473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997463,0.00007819187,0.00003245651,0.00005170987,0.00007344929,0.00001799629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992975,0.0004014527,0.00005187951,0.00002768604,0.0002037437,0.0000176882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000223828,0.0001607417,0.002571289,0.01831968,0.001068889,0.001000219,0.000152725,0.5143145,0.007762743,0.04298903,0.01695053,0.3944859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004903702,0.0003524566,0.002660833,0.002802539,0.001180384,0.0005994894,0.0001356033,0.7132532,0.006139081,0.02876968,0.2438895,0.0001682021],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0314184,0.7588432,0.1793953,0.001832812,0.001187803,0.0001307839,0.0009964644,0.0005172174,0.025678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1914435,0.7501541,0.04834577,0.0006474645,0.0008951267,0.0001712104,0.001115082,0.000147345,0.007080326],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006399657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01272482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04184130715403209,"score_gpt":0.2971683633346351,"score_spread":0.255327056180603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}