{"id":"W2465555842","doi":"10.1080/18756891.2016.1204111","title":"An Interpretable Logical Theory: The case of Compensatory Fuzzy Logic","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretability; Fuzzy logic; Non-classical logic; Logical consequence; Natural language; Computer science; Logical connective; Logical framework; Mathematics; Natural deduction; Artificial intelligence; Natural (archaeology); Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00601676,0.0008935227,0.0007460819,0.002575116,0.001510056,0.004397014,0.001417296,0.002444513,0.00272436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009801446,0.0003690101,0.001718721,0.001281284,0.009107112,0.008540833,0.002940521,0.003114507,0.0003287832],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001687781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001219336,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008195774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005792986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994835,0.002006698,0.0004141628,0.0005850957,0.001817722,0.0003413321],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954826,0.002292837,0.0005374346,0.0007047495,0.0007921864,0.0001903196],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009776572,0.000008821555,0.0001005876,0.00003136216,0.00001152143,0.0002761849,0.0003189096,0.001235286,0.0004742031,0.9954756,0.0001470902,0.00191072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001476632,0.00002581362,0.00009854887,0.00004353651,0.00002289907,0.0002733193,0.0001647639,0.00992092,0.000688067,0.9834657,0.005265638,0.0000161659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04652256,0.001629806,0.8779688,0.00390597,0.0003670535,0.0001487391,0.0001300348,0.0001638017,0.06916327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7817736,0.0007980989,0.2097387,0.0007403613,0.0004680863,0.000250404,0.0001260994,0.00005083198,0.006053846],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00601676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03182006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1648336511681643,"score_gpt":0.4599324850344296,"score_spread":0.2950988338662652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}