{"id":"W2465706857","doi":"","title":"Understanding open source software peer review: review processes, parameters and statistical models, and underlying behaviours and mechanisms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Code review; Data science; Technical peer review; Knowledge management; Software development; Software; Process management; Peer review; Engineering; Software quality; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001317451,0.0004258039,0.0007142055,0.0001616293,0.0002230655,0.000703787,0.0009153131,0.0001939839,0.00002348827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001970945,0.0003867536,0.00003002178,0.0003549848,0.00006375892,0.0008450486,0.0005888385,0.0005003463,0.000002222409],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009698708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002791774,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003329412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000150878,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971512,0.00009466767,0.0004263485,0.001010994,0.0008660508,0.0004507554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977862,0.0008461656,0.0001619128,0.0005063853,0.0003694378,0.0003298896],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008685508,0.0002540993,0.001165025,0.2824531,0.0005697527,0.0002860473,0.004472998,0.00005216334,0.00001604887,0.4104741,0.06538427,0.2347855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003318896,0.001774182,0.004057751,0.2821868,0.002608147,0.001193271,0.002371804,0.0257033,0.000166059,0.6644698,0.002981127,0.009168854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009917019,0.07257791,0.9250783,0.0003301734,0.0001008895,0.001405655,0.00001960531,0.0002171397,0.0001711479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007494625,0.2356632,0.7450725,0.001441154,0.00001568208,0.000525704,0.0007869919,0.0002384806,0.008761615],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2539958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998584,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2386259524335221,"score_gpt":0.3682197459404964,"score_spread":0.1295937935069744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}