{"id":"W2465806835","doi":"10.1900/rds.2015.12.299","title":"Complex Genetics of Type 2 Diabetes and Effect Size: What have We Learned from Isolated Populations?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Review of Diabetic Studies","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Type 2 diabetes; Genetic epidemiology; Genetics; Disease; Biology; Genome-wide association study; Ethnic group; Statistical genetics; Epidemiology; Genetic association; Evolutionary biology; Identification (biology); Diabetes mellitus; Medicine; Demography; Gene; Genome; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Genotype; Genomics; Internal medicine; Anthropology; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02440138,0.0009600715,0.006026514,0.002241391,0.0004368132,0.003176136,0.002481256,0.002282508,0.002615864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04981473,0.0006315311,0.002398698,0.002766631,0.004391523,0.005254623,0.001918304,0.003947289,0.0003588395],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001425461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002404486,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004755872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004308897,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931005,0.003106077,0.001122959,0.001693335,0.0007964466,0.0001807011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.896834,0.09507374,0.002477077,0.002143466,0.002737953,0.0007336293],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007628803,0.00006258126,0.03700777,0.03045269,0.008299043,0.0007407252,0.001688879,0.0009908869,0.0008464907,0.01324668,0.01315156,0.8927498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005424722,0.0018155,0.3112793,0.05897582,0.0159362,0.008041766,0.003644399,0.002573255,0.001222049,0.2336076,0.3617248,0.000636788],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.003531733,0.9804913,0.002427133,0.0119351,0.0006991077,0.00001791944,0.0001660164,0.00002675406,0.0007049515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0340458,0.9499319,0.003798783,0.007223496,0.004386077,0.00008411259,0.0002382261,0.00004174917,0.0002498091],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02440138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1290484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1437813723553774,"score_gpt":0.4024562247771973,"score_spread":0.2586748524218199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}