{"id":"W2466430666","doi":"10.1118/1.4955900","title":"SU‐F‐I‐72: Evaluation of the Ancillary Lead Shielding for Optimizing Radiation Protection in the Interventional Radiology Department","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Radiation Dose and Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Radiation protection; Medical physics; Electromagnetic shielding; Interventional radiology; Medicine; Dosimetry; Lead (geology); Nuclear medicine; Radiation shielding; Radiation dose; Radiology; Engineering; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009514703,0.0006846931,0.0004221425,0.0004438641,0.0002142738,0.0006478195,0.000472932,0.0003729227,0.0008216787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002388766,0.0001944271,0.0002607793,0.0003218634,0.0003125786,0.0003116392,0.0002211508,0.0003200111,0.0002501319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003319859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004536614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001065651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008822709,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992992,0.0001706487,0.00003393374,0.0001197406,0.0003094664,0.00006696626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991502,0.0002569566,0.0002316412,0.00006816367,0.0001596846,0.0001333783],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.008445156,0.0009761244,0.0556163,0.0005053557,0.0001571464,0.0002482748,0.0002802889,0.005755557,0.8091049,0.0001369849,0.0005631183,0.1182108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002140451,0.02728158,0.1445524,0.00005889008,0.0004863694,0.002199848,0.0002516337,0.02319671,0.7978125,0.00008587214,0.003765356,0.00009474056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904226,0.002450682,0.00597826,0.00003334968,0.00002417275,0.00003637825,0.00005009069,0.0001438608,0.000860649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892156,0.0005225977,0.009664136,0.00002965363,0.00001490073,0.00001928561,0.0001139459,0.00007571857,0.0003441835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001065651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005031884,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.062774579967133,"score_gpt":0.3425041550180083,"score_spread":0.2797295750508754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}