{"id":"W2467368176","doi":"10.1002/cjas.1392","title":"Protect, profit, profess, promote: Establishing legitimacy through logics of diversity in Canadian accounting firm recruitment documents","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Diversity (politics); Accounting; Diversity management; Impression management; Profit (economics); Business; Institutional theory; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Sociology; Management; Law; Social science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009073326,0.0002424286,0.0003881089,0.0006926439,0.004198368,0.0004708344,0.001605088,0.0001917818,0.0002096259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003199986,0.0002076854,0.0001218298,0.001996337,0.006029161,0.003999402,0.00006777719,0.0003038621,0.000003225684],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003870722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03399877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8056807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958689,0.000637204,0.0007862671,0.0005182333,0.0005681399,0.00162121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963754,0.0002541406,0.0008952168,0.000178634,0.0007346102,0.001562038],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004345959,0.00006130774,0.7830029,0.0001022055,0.00002947269,0.000398857,0.1451644,0.00006707122,0.0003037025,0.06717187,0.0002228844,0.003431879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002661461,0.01054856,0.367653,0.004076914,0.0001761896,0.0005888709,0.3810801,0.0002672221,0.00697607,0.1942762,0.02930417,0.002391191],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724591,0.0001214226,0.0002326522,0.005159664,0.0005588644,0.0009391414,0.0001124004,0.000008502552,0.02040826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957454,0.00004383088,0.003638451,0.0001405911,0.0001289669,0.00001389601,0.000002540785,0.000006267082,0.0002800928],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4153499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999533,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.393836658362394,"score_gpt":0.3959662175426631,"score_spread":0.002129559180269136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}