{"id":"W2467428114","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2016-0057","title":"Optimal profile for concave slopes under static and seismic conditions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Longitudinal static stability; Chord (peer-to-peer); Limit analysis; Offset (computer science); Stability (learning theory); Geotechnical engineering; Slope stability; Geology; Factor of safety; Slope stability analysis; Retaining wall; Structural engineering; Engineering; Finite element method; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000173313,0.0001536626,0.0002074357,0.0002164489,0.0001492596,0.00006498271,0.0001470207,0.0001528613,0.000131679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001445787,0.0001171637,0.0001007734,0.0001330934,0.00009235116,0.0001053966,0.00001200354,0.0002674012,0.00002623319],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001252349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001834061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001226588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999005,0.00001206078,0.0002567921,0.0001433175,0.00009893414,0.0004838539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988578,0.0001819458,0.00002668868,0.0001353259,0.00006452782,0.0007337324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002095247,0.000006968386,0.000009677019,0.00003075822,0.0001343263,0.00003376409,0.00001936456,0.9626717,0.003615512,0.00108129,0.02123848,0.0111561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001102942,0.0001475356,0.0007585714,0.0001971466,0.0001202438,0.0005153575,0.000134488,0.8468086,0.0007807265,0.003909664,0.1450786,0.0004461832],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03939388,0.0002528875,0.9565606,0.002875865,0.0001468314,0.0001825108,0.0002536414,0.0002229793,0.0001107764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963096,0.0001131762,0.002767786,0.0002307036,0.0001137282,0.00003499068,0.000008439646,0.00003753435,0.0003840764],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4777799,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007714149656210079,"score_gpt":0.2062334192828993,"score_spread":0.1985192696266892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}