{"id":"W2467428114","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2016-0057","title":"Optimal profile for concave slopes under static and seismic conditions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Longitudinal static stability; Chord (peer-to-peer); Limit analysis; Offset (computer science); Stability (learning theory); Geotechnical engineering; Slope stability; Geology; Factor of safety; Slope stability analysis; Retaining wall; Structural engineering; Engineering; Finite element method; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002947008,0.0004496957,0.0002578151,0.0005887445,0.000317708,0.0006446415,0.0003795501,0.0003026307,0.001302574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001298916,0.0002149259,0.0002524222,0.0002465744,0.0004516132,0.0004744285,0.0004174501,0.0002934246,0.0003480883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004187078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007499422,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001662113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002966783,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998369,0.00002520857,0.000007498175,0.0000333972,0.00007213136,0.00002479199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997305,0.00007205239,0.00005817716,0.00003326612,0.00008743269,0.00001849887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003588937,0.0000855475,0.018439,0.0002142451,0.00001948709,0.0005963895,0.0003707893,0.6801555,0.1458658,0.02470516,0.0007272564,0.128462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009128315,0.0001089916,0.003218543,0.00001972843,0.000008001134,0.0001883794,0.0001292444,0.9620103,0.02921227,0.003981329,0.001094192,0.00001984677],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3115709,0.00008598419,0.6823377,0.00004302521,0.000009935136,0.00005263381,0.0000694777,0.0002450134,0.005585433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9323307,0.0000573808,0.06649279,0.000008015494,0.000003270312,0.00002875144,0.00005197362,0.00003793315,0.0009893134],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001662113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004357517,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.007714149656210079,"score_gpt":0.2062334192828993,"score_spread":0.1985192696266892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}