{"id":"W2468188327","doi":"10.1007/s10551-016-3234-3","title":"Social Trust and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Misconduct; Business ethics; Affect (linguistics); Quality of Life Research; Psychology; China; Social trust; Social psychology; Criminology; Business; Public relations; Political science; Law; Social capital","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001555638,0.0002231501,0.000376098,0.0001886539,0.0003132156,0.0003615131,0.0004282522,0.0001775846,0.0002284653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02156234,0.0001554105,0.00008310097,0.0004834952,0.0002576497,0.002969333,0.0002948783,0.0006697053,0.00006779547],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005586588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001162522,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003533735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005327378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981411,0.00004058469,0.0005565085,0.0002494653,0.0007468832,0.000265484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773444,0.0003230299,0.02116469,0.0001616792,0.0009842684,0.0000219132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008123338,0.0002483529,0.5078071,0.001499437,0.0004303583,0.0006887385,0.002501262,0.0001784528,0.03637516,0.03320991,0.04364982,0.3725991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185156,0.0000146283,0.9166031,0.001602481,0.0001840113,0.00001643176,0.0001200703,0.00008078839,0.000142167,0.01929576,0.06038694,0.0003684004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8706263,0.0004143389,0.08253771,0.04481743,0.0007861761,0.00009319639,0.000003796448,0.00003738688,0.0006836816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932505,0.0005427157,0.0004320155,0.001229341,0.00385687,0.000001515513,0.000001352005,0.00003775,0.0006478828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4087961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09408656050427963,"score_gpt":0.2749288785786402,"score_spread":0.1808423180743605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}