{"id":"W2468188327","doi":"10.1007/s10551-016-3234-3","title":"Social Trust and Corporate Misconduct: Evidence from China","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Misconduct; Business ethics; Affect (linguistics); Quality of Life Research; Psychology; China; Social trust; Social psychology; Criminology; Business; Public relations; Political science; Law; Social capital","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002812855,0.0003249194,0.0005883359,0.00338728,0.002949766,0.001593876,0.0009563126,0.0008777049,0.003145863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009646786,0.0002906714,0.0005792279,0.006031147,0.003682445,0.001268671,0.001932773,0.001088256,0.0001853026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00343213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006739928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1622773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2068809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976011,0.0007209622,0.0002346819,0.0002613364,0.0005364091,0.0006455468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740298,0.008322248,0.009706081,0.001227167,0.003849349,0.002865311],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000825261,0.0001319866,0.9875425,0.00006531546,0.0001235178,0.0005042538,0.004008016,0.0001357445,0.0000770326,0.001034062,0.0004304427,0.005864489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002765014,0.0001039192,0.9905731,0.00007578663,0.0001729009,0.0001901476,0.00635041,0.0005574445,0.0001279029,0.0007734071,0.001028278,0.00001908912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979578,0.0004096794,0.00003861184,0.0003813649,0.000004581249,0.000007379705,0.00007687871,0.000001001339,0.001122557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993882,0.0002675738,0.00001639736,0.00006346792,0.000006220542,0.000003988321,0.00006531422,6.620554e-7,0.000188151],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1622773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3226655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09408656050427963,"score_gpt":0.2749288785786402,"score_spread":0.1808423180743605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}