{"id":"W2469175863","doi":"10.1080/00224561.2007.12436011","title":"An integrated economic-hydrologic modeling framework for the watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Watershed; Toolbox; Watershed management; Valuation (finance); Agriculture; Environmental resource management; Subsidy; Environmental economics; Nonmarket forces; Environmental planning; General partnership; Environmental science; Business; Computer science; Economics; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00205904,0.0009398297,0.000849784,0.001146489,0.0009742503,0.002373715,0.002687686,0.001813183,0.002857651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003575145,0.0005356309,0.001166059,0.001315706,0.001094427,0.002632256,0.001422239,0.001544348,0.0003810744],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002771797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004824762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03022988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02601725,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999138,0.0004204959,0.00004802069,0.0001001664,0.0002226307,0.00007071562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990162,0.0005184987,0.0001240632,0.00005803372,0.0002008686,0.00008223938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004077303,0.00003515628,0.0004428316,0.00001471125,0.00001658929,0.00003209413,0.00003865063,0.9119413,0.0001710418,0.08352607,0.0004212179,0.003356196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006839643,0.000009452951,0.0001456265,0.000007820674,0.000008725833,0.00001061973,0.00002368331,0.9714428,0.00006439792,0.0257808,0.002489794,0.00000940904],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01162156,0.0001742431,0.9700207,0.001293883,0.00005333233,0.0001194362,0.0003421321,0.0001740921,0.01620056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5520928,0.001379383,0.4323415,0.0003399741,0.0001821828,0.001155568,0.0007008616,0.000243846,0.01156387],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03022988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06010783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04490196227015674,"score_gpt":0.275632647617799,"score_spread":0.2307306853476422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}