{"id":"W2469730376","doi":"10.3182/20060402-4-br-2902.00323","title":"DESIGN OF ROBUST GAIN-SCHEDULED MPC CONTROLLERS FOR NONLINEAR PROCESSES","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFAC Proceedings Volumes","topic":"Advanced Control Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); Nonlinear system; Model predictive control; Stability (learning theory); Linear matrix inequality; Robust control; Robustness (evolution); Computer science; Control engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Control (management)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000755555,0.0008384031,0.0006589329,0.0003864285,0.0003812494,0.0008099778,0.0008528791,0.0008549409,0.001427869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001710609,0.000469034,0.0004417066,0.0002394434,0.0005229321,0.0004296969,0.0005975239,0.0007632381,0.000304283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004427451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009617048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002205912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002271492,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997101,0.00005818768,0.00001469375,0.00006244485,0.0001144142,0.00004018296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995913,0.000169707,0.00008883046,0.00003292858,0.00009932765,0.00001794049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001190727,0.00005459261,0.0001403955,0.0001513287,0.00003359904,0.00009949627,0.00006394684,0.9324216,0.01237299,0.008374576,0.0007004691,0.04546794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143833,0.00005811635,0.00007082138,0.000004444165,0.000005948328,0.000009846608,0.000003880889,0.996449,0.001637697,0.001449393,0.0002924157,0.000004017274],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0197372,0.0003526223,0.9757776,0.0001044495,0.00005680591,0.00007461978,0.00003097939,0.0003541824,0.003511533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757697,0.0002755506,0.1211781,0.00007858669,0.00006432896,0.0002621433,0.00008926763,0.00005794017,0.002224357],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002205912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004776657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01125530745263673,"score_gpt":0.2023582086777354,"score_spread":0.1911029012250986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}