{"id":"W2469797092","doi":"10.18438/b8f630","title":"Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Quality assessment; Quality (philosophy); MEDLINE; Medicine; Computer science; External quality assessment; Pathology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.7606668,0.004805288,0.01390191,0.03900177,0.005280227,0.02492811,0.00730857,0.007094188,0.005506537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8517474,0.006528695,0.02047219,0.04259031,0.009198274,0.01682678,0.01824181,0.005882393,0.001300044],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03401254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07352253,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007018199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00959004,"domain_scores_codex":[0.06197711,0.8004281,0.09447341,0.005304156,0.03698419,0.0008330857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.08504029,0.7268397,0.07503295,0.0231956,0.08869382,0.001197581],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001328895,0.0002282936,0.0099761,0.5111287,0.04104099,0.0002112365,0.01374556,0.006381149,0.0008179695,0.0449689,0.01144427,0.358728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004817747,0.002677164,0.0100251,0.7615049,0.04611984,0.0005123554,0.005898477,0.01698647,0.00305876,0.07692493,0.07035576,0.001118455],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.007348821,0.4038216,0.4725812,0.02154472,0.004170363,0.08025029,0.00232034,0.0008833336,0.007079293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06263043,0.08535004,0.7185842,0.003204521,0.0009224378,0.1279983,0.0005775563,0.0001834136,0.0005491349],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2393332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2951404,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9301618621525981,"score_gpt":0.6337981688306544,"score_spread":0.2963636933219437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}