{"id":"W2469894439","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2016-0066","title":"No magic number: determining cost-effective sample size and enumeration effort for diatom-based environmental assessment analyses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Enumeration; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Environmental science; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Diatom; Ecology; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03123287,0.00107292,0.001624192,0.00238657,0.0006381594,0.001749328,0.002684601,0.001257259,0.002760335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1199932,0.001008652,0.0009525361,0.002199736,0.0007171425,0.002943221,0.002058921,0.0008615711,0.0009766704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00120519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001627747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003176835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009910118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9830261,0.009233129,0.001512407,0.001444079,0.004448204,0.0003359911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.928561,0.05127366,0.005539188,0.006864477,0.006794694,0.0009669774],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002300363,0.0004869466,0.1585836,0.001328666,0.0007140606,0.0002750537,0.0004918678,0.0369666,0.02068792,0.01294383,0.01200416,0.7532169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008770538,0.00356711,0.1881032,0.001231016,0.001179085,0.00134384,0.0007145189,0.6516322,0.07130563,0.04300658,0.03640067,0.0006390708],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2032733,0.00268581,0.7813152,0.001386105,0.0003006129,0.001562642,0.002124719,0.001318458,0.006033132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1590365,0.0003574644,0.8373023,0.0002516602,0.00003894607,0.001183185,0.0009776631,0.0002074425,0.0006448476],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03123287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1651772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.018615193047635,"score_gpt":0.2668360797432459,"score_spread":0.2482208866956108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}