{"id":"W2471297504","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-10-2014-1843","title":"Internal audit quality: a polysemous notion?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Internal audit; Audit; Originality; Viewpoints; Quality audit; External auditor; Accounting; Corporate governance; Framing (construction); Business; Public relations; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science; Engineering; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.007756266,0.0008795037,0.0009525233,0.0007653409,0.001686972,0.002777161,0.001926392,0.0002737556,0.003078959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654297,0.0006979447,0.0006374149,0.00112804,0.0004321758,0.007890658,0.001266378,0.001332204,0.003332633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009069758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001985791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002086991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004567032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9921665,0.0001471859,0.002290786,0.001335177,0.002229469,0.001830893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595909,0.0009607885,0.03659343,0.001150728,0.001592565,0.0001116456],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001884983,0.0002899084,0.5111893,0.0002971546,0.0002359996,0.00008853729,0.0002079273,0.0000919356,0.006808273,0.005790603,0.01707061,0.4577413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00434068,0.00006044597,0.5430497,0.001815657,0.0003271248,0.0003739109,0.001528246,0.0003994502,0.0003408996,0.02241678,0.4229063,0.002440757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7813694,0.0001075749,0.1891042,0.007036963,0.002953961,0.0004223006,0.00002021823,0.000781816,0.01820349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9792548,0.0000348897,0.0008377729,0.005029718,0.01313725,0.00003865917,0.00001117674,0.0001832858,0.001472489],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4553005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0164879530122632,"score_gpt":0.2620962738012451,"score_spread":0.2456083207889819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}