{"id":"W2471371869","doi":"10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.11.011","title":"Bunching at the kink: Implications for spending responses to health insurance contracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Public Economics","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Economics; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Set (abstract data type); Object (grammar); Medicare Part D; Econometrics; Public economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Prescription drug; Medical prescription; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003030368,0.0002017611,0.0006867609,0.0006662253,0.002618411,0.003914017,0.001000266,0.002333633,0.03575329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02237176,0.0003597665,0.0003615999,0.000974787,0.002133091,0.002414835,0.002901575,0.001878703,0.0008575729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00297834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001882282,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02359901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03768482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976133,0.0009349324,0.00007029904,0.0002770085,0.000262899,0.0008415913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990698,0.005248637,0.001292313,0.0006498571,0.0006893261,0.001421793],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002062247,0.001113931,0.2971705,0.000176927,0.0001850174,0.001153931,0.03590218,0.01398651,0.004432582,0.5615833,0.0141957,0.06803714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001852899,0.0003365813,0.4075693,0.0001955038,0.0001114892,0.0002759448,0.1110554,0.02393503,0.0008703324,0.4284566,0.02687199,0.000136517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076707,0.0002112092,0.003775805,0.006766725,0.00005209152,0.00006209049,0.0002923356,0.00002415777,0.08114491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957185,0.00003220402,0.0001680814,0.0003021722,0.0000100965,0.00001346803,0.00002734058,0.000008020544,0.003720176],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03575329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1196066,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08456020567782002,"score_gpt":0.3494598422167804,"score_spread":0.2648996365389604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}