{"id":"W2471432156","doi":"10.12775/llp.2016.014","title":"Profiles of Dialogue for Repairing Faults in Arguments from Expert Opinion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Logic and Logical Philosophy","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Fallacy; Argument (complex analysis); Expert opinion; Computer science; Software; Graph; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Theoretical computer science; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0254908,0.001482816,0.001179391,0.005559826,0.002661238,0.006365965,0.003512849,0.004494869,0.006286607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107404,0.001506787,0.002480938,0.002512949,0.005928599,0.01713476,0.008432655,0.004159922,0.002200891],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002489985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003412795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002281697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002036075,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9673638,0.02206409,0.002330516,0.003573441,0.003739356,0.0009289494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9194434,0.05267189,0.004913893,0.01632534,0.004774929,0.001870645],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007746869,0.000235621,0.004282299,0.0004964033,0.0001028891,0.0005995512,0.01398226,0.02384017,0.004858653,0.6830714,0.006140754,0.2616153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009256114,0.0002416488,0.0009681078,0.0004248702,0.0001241786,0.00080274,0.002648486,0.3346981,0.008041142,0.6055293,0.04626461,0.0001642217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006203243,0.000088957,0.9885542,0.0004058598,0.00005342658,0.0002389279,0.0001425598,0.00129251,0.003020359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1913956,0.00009825396,0.8051987,0.0001812547,0.00005685625,0.0004286717,0.0004631446,0.0003802812,0.001797204],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0254908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1348099,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07192412517072126,"score_gpt":0.2901861854819396,"score_spread":0.2182620603112184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}