{"id":"W2471594703","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2015-0578","title":"Comparing electrofishing and snorkelling for characterizing fish assemblages over time and space","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electrofishing; Abundance (ecology); Species richness; Sampling (signal processing); Relative species abundance; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Point pattern analysis; Fishery; Spatial ecology; Geography; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002397982,0.0004454534,0.0003825489,0.002155302,0.0003661765,0.0003699002,0.0004684046,0.0003612924,0.0005751988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004756908,0.0002889556,0.0002976652,0.00175551,0.0005756842,0.0009833688,0.001115399,0.0002380777,0.0001362095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004631902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006864622,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008350668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04407014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972029,0.0008019854,0.0002823641,0.0006504643,0.0009302741,0.0001320305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959777,0.001135548,0.001119744,0.0003936317,0.001050203,0.0003232749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009125065,0.0002995726,0.8617749,0.0002936581,0.0003633713,0.00012358,0.001477549,0.001235192,0.06145952,0.0002196396,0.000152481,0.07168807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001599146,0.0009449428,0.992649,0.00001323612,0.00006782912,0.0001115479,0.0004461985,0.001167024,0.004002898,0.00008516445,0.000472717,0.00002329144],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920681,0.0001485422,0.006409463,0.000007459379,0.000009135536,0.0002333474,0.0002130951,0.00001201735,0.0008988878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599186,0.0003739618,0.03645616,0.00003185912,0.0000163215,0.0009227644,0.0009739022,0.0000171229,0.001289182],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008350668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01660413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01734174544731683,"score_gpt":0.2088305500648441,"score_spread":0.1914888046175273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}