{"id":"W2471698541","doi":"10.12943/cnr.2015.00053","title":"A METHOD FOR COINCIDENCE SUMMING COMPENSATION OF SIMULATION RESULTS USING MCNP ON Co60 VOLUME SOURCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CNL Nuclear Review","topic":"Nuclear reactor physics and engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Nuclear Laboratories","funders":"","keywords":"Coincidence; Monte Carlo method; Detector; Calibration; Compensation (psychology); Volume (thermodynamics); Physics; Computer science; Computational physics; Optics; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001886177,0.0008992952,0.0007267836,0.001787195,0.0008669156,0.001092415,0.001650353,0.0007206471,0.005485306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004724713,0.0004882726,0.0006384843,0.001451474,0.0004604176,0.0008056244,0.0009566616,0.001173701,0.001021519],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009003368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001937606,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002635349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002533215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976938,0.0003607875,0.0001367398,0.0002527435,0.001483883,0.00007196693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977251,0.0006105051,0.0001774208,0.0003257718,0.001111648,0.00004962912],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005602433,0.0002759905,0.005462895,0.001345522,0.0003348957,0.0005687072,0.001068241,0.2021916,0.1568807,0.07381485,0.01664112,0.5408553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007560623,0.000246373,0.003294988,0.0001181744,0.0001324619,0.0008607618,0.0001216574,0.7681651,0.1582214,0.008588182,0.05995856,0.0002167722],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003526319,0.0001191481,0.9912219,0.00003875588,0.00007762031,0.0001124145,0.00009869008,0.002469811,0.002335344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1011475,0.0002487397,0.8930529,0.00007273343,0.00003936538,0.0005357593,0.0004032101,0.001484164,0.003015715],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005485306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01835012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0420605576454323,"score_gpt":0.2989843029650572,"score_spread":0.2569237453196249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}