{"id":"W2472066353","doi":"10.29173/cais460","title":"Bias in Subject Access Standards: A Content Analysis of the Critical Literature","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI","topic":"Higher Education Learning Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Nationality; Race (biology); Ethnic group; Content analysis; Human sexuality; Psychology; Content (measure theory); Social psychology; Gender studies; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; World Wide Web; Immigration; Social science; Anthropology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002165812,0.0001786588,0.0005119495,0.0002830494,0.0002120285,0.003851261,0.002248904,0.0001772122,0.0002384341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1243462,0.0001168797,0.0002616894,0.002630674,0.001073511,0.0113327,0.0003729801,0.0004333226,0.000001463936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001202665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008310055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006623227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000632723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975091,0.0002251544,0.0005806219,0.000277826,0.001035247,0.000371999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9139376,0.001271104,0.001206974,0.0002851837,0.08314502,0.0001541387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004746997,0.0001465855,0.7678835,0.000118228,0.000176922,2.073069e-7,0.2100689,0.000006680057,0.001267122,0.01822206,0.001439712,0.000622595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000248923,0.00007647728,0.9169668,0.0004669213,0.0003612547,0.000001444334,0.02849396,0.00009455477,0.00341845,0.001638056,0.04803307,0.0002001143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726723,0.0001981924,0.000003925305,0.01829715,0.0001885363,0.0003828241,0.0001179954,0.00001805857,0.008120976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862,0.0001050009,0.00009157982,0.0002539928,0.0000587476,0.00004077331,0.00000163463,0.00001089663,0.0008173847],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1815749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08818707045863096,"score_gpt":0.3767200775014438,"score_spread":0.2885330070428129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}