{"id":"W2472213348","doi":"10.1007/s11160-016-9435-0","title":"Stock assessment in inland fisheries: a foundation for sustainable use and conservation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stock assessment; Stock (firearms); Fisheries management; Fishery; Environmental resource management; Habitat; Fisheries science; Stocking; Sustainability; Business; Biology; Environmental planning; Ecology; Fishing; Geography; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01589678,0.001565233,0.002660982,0.004486253,0.0007187281,0.005447947,0.002665182,0.002056945,0.003570887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02462669,0.0004619221,0.0009917964,0.004059141,0.001852591,0.008588368,0.002197667,0.002472002,0.000552756],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002042337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004346906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01301238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02387063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9964084,0.001244357,0.0006199316,0.0003331509,0.001222978,0.0001711329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820607,0.005447155,0.002523675,0.001014274,0.008190541,0.0007636506],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005703733,0.000255577,0.04793814,0.001613823,0.0005356606,0.00008652968,0.0002854599,0.007123629,0.001048426,0.01455482,0.01547419,0.9110267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006843392,0.0007651146,0.2242227,0.01931991,0.002163563,0.0006937346,0.00694904,0.07466367,0.007635424,0.353337,0.3095932,0.0005883165],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.06786417,0.509093,0.2713892,0.1052015,0.00971362,0.0003964447,0.002828027,0.0005204011,0.03299369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4132391,0.3634591,0.1950371,0.006467303,0.008501272,0.0001963005,0.002084267,0.0001981807,0.01081739],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01589678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08407122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05255691300341591,"score_gpt":0.3218292595491483,"score_spread":0.2692723465457324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}