{"id":"W2472558198","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1522488113","title":"Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Critical infrastructure; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Cartography; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009535761,0.00007769938,0.00008666065,0.000092526,0.0003925548,0.00004084616,0.0005473506,0.00004784357,0.0002358504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003434469,0.00004334553,0.00003498366,0.0005478286,0.0003545316,0.001056181,0.0002499,0.00006968204,0.00001444544],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001192711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002373218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005822308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.538835e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984353,0.000007707641,0.0002835295,0.0002232445,0.0009008627,0.000149405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.00007427701,0.0002593535,0.000009272791,0.00006397464,0.00004279859],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009998101,0.00003080337,0.3332118,0.000005644667,0.000004439064,2.26946e-9,0.0003626665,0.00004041288,0.6541738,0.001992204,0.007833164,0.002335068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008419211,0.00001737191,0.8742102,0.00008407119,0.00000253853,0.000002767013,0.0002176658,0.00004596339,0.1100662,0.004425803,0.01077404,0.00006920956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868985,0.000002472551,0.00002291453,0.007161168,0.00001816284,0.0001037494,0.00000442059,0.00001015486,0.005778475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908012,0.000001204828,0.007139899,0.001273409,0.00003290296,0.00001029868,4.912156e-8,0.000003059636,0.0007379993],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5441076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3019254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0345553980655801,"score_gpt":0.3180509754038591,"score_spread":0.283495577338279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}