{"id":"W2472558198","doi":"10.1073/pnas.1522488113","title":"Assessing large-scale wildlife responses to human infrastructure development","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":238,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte","keywords":"Threatened species; Wildlife; Scale (ratio); Geography; Environmental resource management; Critical infrastructure; Environmental planning; Ecology; Environmental science; Habitat; Cartography; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002943923,0.0004769826,0.0002520514,0.001489319,0.0001687024,0.0008239913,0.0005895984,0.0005844964,0.001147783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006292806,0.0001738164,0.0005936683,0.001478851,0.0003964493,0.0009697977,0.0009626563,0.0003161923,0.0001230861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001150749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005827025,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01647724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02577389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998569,0.0008341194,0.00006287405,0.0002017178,0.0001623492,0.0001699339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966383,0.001859452,0.0007257058,0.0002501301,0.0003481568,0.0001782992],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001470874,0.0001352036,0.8287653,0.0000752823,0.0003741939,0.000153761,0.0002455655,0.1467898,0.001416473,0.0004411929,0.0002808906,0.02117524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008929942,0.0004821622,0.8892547,0.00002070618,0.00008547131,0.00006552126,0.001361108,0.1057865,0.001089728,0.001061463,0.0007572105,0.00002648551],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938303,0.00006145097,0.004204776,0.00004991257,0.000004429485,0.00004726645,0.000547863,0.00002573941,0.001228376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976202,0.00003958726,0.00178331,0.000008154673,0.000002327586,0.00002861464,0.0003581728,0.000004000738,0.0001556007],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01647724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03276271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0345553980655801,"score_gpt":0.3180509754038591,"score_spread":0.283495577338279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}