{"id":"W2473103752","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.05.005","title":"Debunking the psychometric properties of the LS\\CMI: An application of item response theory with a risk assessment instrument","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Criminal Justice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Item response theory; Predictive validity; Sample (material); Officer; Psychometrics; Test (biology); Clinical psychology; Applied psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003824633,0.0002305085,0.0003863572,0.0003826986,0.0001539606,0.00002571666,0.0009009183,0.00009288675,0.00005027639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005391389,0.00009466459,0.0001628987,0.0006575498,0.000425783,0.0002531929,0.00005697541,0.0004180283,0.000007298877],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001413746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797692,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003075267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001037073,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961226,0.001567843,0.0009560347,0.00024894,0.0008042812,0.0003002906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950879,0.001090346,0.002399643,0.000840489,0.0004742302,0.0001074066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1097171,0.005182558,0.08139924,0.001212821,0.002455627,0.00003209045,0.06016944,0.0002199974,0.3062005,0.04643521,0.0112543,0.3757211],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007747349,0.01001645,0.8492016,0.002399413,0.007040798,0.001643331,0.09685015,0.0001294476,0.01626076,0.002998504,0.005035441,0.0006767179],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9763798,0.0007097154,0.01255017,0.000913045,0.008009698,0.0003580272,0.000008677971,0.00001563108,0.001055212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997641,0.00003707244,0.00141642,0.00018644,0.0005540596,0.00001871675,1.434523e-7,0.00005529437,0.00009082184],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7678024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.386031,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04170780184185405,"score_gpt":0.3263802037696498,"score_spread":0.2846724019277957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}