{"id":"W2474518875","doi":"10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.261","title":"Comparative Assessment of Public Bike Sharing Systems","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transportation research procedia","topic":"Urban Transport and Accessibility","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Transport Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Bike sharing; Categorization; Process (computing); Computer science; Process management; Transport engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005532425,0.000514437,0.0006249597,0.008927963,0.001286639,0.003546627,0.000789278,0.0006095245,0.006617161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01347013,0.0002273908,0.0005855419,0.00797983,0.0006684631,0.004428689,0.001962336,0.0003612579,0.0006729651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003354001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001722344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005138568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006545485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916681,0.003484848,0.0005260903,0.0006139768,0.003244242,0.0004627767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877691,0.004493767,0.0009565598,0.0006541546,0.005838863,0.0002876133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016509,0.0005391872,0.1846151,0.005116959,0.0006880104,0.0005068302,0.01529881,0.02297452,0.01098863,0.037595,0.00348335,0.7165427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007786325,0.008131092,0.6989062,0.002854331,0.001327934,0.001198424,0.105394,0.04697273,0.02045595,0.01710117,0.09722964,0.0003507228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9138459,0.003821367,0.01530271,0.0003236863,0.00006749672,0.0004340026,0.000788443,0.000130963,0.06528544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918185,0.0008752929,0.004759752,0.00001433173,0.00001518979,0.00009613261,0.0004362472,0.00001495755,0.001969587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008927963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02925861,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2905195237132192,"score_gpt":0.5001993301769921,"score_spread":0.209679806463773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}