{"id":"W2474545121","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0158370","title":"Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Australian Research Council; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social","keywords":"Anomie; Social psychology; Discriminant validity; Legitimacy; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Internal consistency; Psychometrics; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000736662,0.00002666184,0.00007634371,0.000009791035,0.0001232781,0.000005465016,0.0001476968,0.00002776395,0.0004048294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004683187,0.00001419513,0.00002909778,0.00006302145,0.0001650179,0.00003768255,0.00001514674,0.00002610853,0.00006533453],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004524749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002540595,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001767567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009149133,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993199,0.00009896883,0.00009690358,0.00006649101,0.0003036971,0.0001140476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996248,0.00008855083,0.00005672631,0.00008542468,0.0001224878,0.0000220195],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000708209,0.0006166397,0.05056333,0.00003887829,0.0004147736,0.00000124796,0.02377576,2.119026e-8,0.6046777,0.1302516,0.00368802,0.1859012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003620409,0.0007224584,0.3205962,0.004651882,0.0006158684,6.039465e-7,0.03045274,0.00000829897,0.248926,0.1127557,0.2764607,0.001189141],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.758786,0.0001781432,0.0000370345,0.03078607,0.0001015618,0.0001346931,0.000001534046,0.00002703221,0.2099479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981993,0.0001054992,0.00006942731,0.0002133331,0.0005841011,0.000007116048,3.924126e-8,0.000002655565,0.0008184916],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3557517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4432598,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1595682319117681,"score_gpt":0.3111937923004773,"score_spread":0.1516255603887092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}