{"id":"W2474545121","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0158370","title":"Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Australian Research Council; Centro de Estudios de Conflicto y Cohesión Social","keywords":"Anomie; Social psychology; Discriminant validity; Legitimacy; Psychology; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Internal consistency; Psychometrics; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01257895,0.0005710492,0.0005487883,0.004524571,0.001054024,0.002821527,0.001128226,0.0006875402,0.00189018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04578001,0.0003407403,0.0006589828,0.003030267,0.004424066,0.004979486,0.005180371,0.002181124,0.0001831419],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001246801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001962892,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00260788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003882114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.990973,0.004661063,0.001429061,0.0007106062,0.001882845,0.0003435169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641668,0.01904083,0.006670249,0.004194864,0.004933196,0.0009939878],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002070478,0.0002657016,0.6045461,0.001919798,0.0007156709,0.0005221983,0.05845081,0.002066089,0.005224473,0.0943331,0.00608021,0.2256688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005160516,0.0006736307,0.7889076,0.001733899,0.0004156927,0.001498916,0.06898797,0.004605026,0.003122968,0.09093898,0.03881486,0.0002488477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8820015,0.004208012,0.05734366,0.003958073,0.0007666904,0.0004000654,0.0007500247,0.0001543332,0.05041759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862182,0.0009350687,0.01140861,0.0004747694,0.0000865834,0.0002027795,0.0001588258,0.00002083009,0.0004943346],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01257895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06652462,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1595682319117681,"score_gpt":0.3111937923004773,"score_spread":0.1516255603887092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}