{"id":"W2476601773","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.07.018","title":"Addressing a systematic bias in carbon dioxide flux measurements with the EC150 and the IRGASON open-path gas analyzers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"Biological and Environmental Research; U.S. Geological Survey; Lunds Universitet; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Universität Innsbruck; Canada Research Chairs; U.S. Department of Energy; Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; German Academic Exchange Service London; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; National Science Foundation; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Smithsonian Institution","keywords":"Carbon dioxide; Environmental science; Flux (metallurgy); Path (computing); Gas analyzer; Systematic error; Atmospheric sciences; Physics; Chemistry; Statistics; Computer science; Environmental chemistry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007522946,0.0009641121,0.000698248,0.0009280492,0.001197726,0.001317821,0.001337713,0.00145073,0.001280149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01936746,0.0005144562,0.0004361889,0.001690196,0.000573065,0.00105349,0.001176722,0.0007546584,0.0006657889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009227963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001607183,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007945177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0191041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906059,0.002688912,0.0007173751,0.002382143,0.003149093,0.0004565416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912587,0.003105153,0.0008476932,0.001297809,0.003362586,0.0001280726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001797118,0.0003570631,0.4122804,0.0008049242,0.0008804647,0.0003324162,0.001411062,0.003808818,0.4407247,0.003596373,0.006053642,0.127953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001480787,0.0007403198,0.3547123,0.0001807871,0.0008646029,0.001014576,0.0004717293,0.03153545,0.5768349,0.003059313,0.03024749,0.0001906039],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.783632,0.003448327,0.1943712,0.001326575,0.001473076,0.000287656,0.002682874,0.002950948,0.009827277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377185,0.0004032943,0.05559787,0.001524475,0.0001702803,0.0001935613,0.001049126,0.0008495903,0.002493323],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007945177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03978556,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02710516181273818,"score_gpt":0.2139975499505054,"score_spread":0.1868923881377673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}