{"id":"W2477098329","doi":"10.1002/esp.4010","title":"Impacts of river bank stabilization using riprap on fish habitat in two contrasting environments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Riprap; Riparian zone; Habitat; STREAMS; Bank; Environmental science; Bank erosion; Fluvial; Hydrology (agriculture); Stream restoration; Large woody debris; Macrophyte; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; River ecosystem; Erosion; Geology; Geomorphology; Structural basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002056083,0.0001338055,0.0001711701,0.00002212363,0.00007275341,0.000008670683,0.00007466238,0.00005024389,0.0003815971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005600461,0.0000814969,0.00001627116,0.000155629,0.0002064586,0.0004554182,0.00002656462,0.00006177666,0.00001316545],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002106177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001795955,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001629644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00151657,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999074,0.00001806911,0.0002227123,0.0002465675,0.0001847501,0.0002539284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996398,0.00009852405,0.0001025052,0.00008432313,0.000006461039,0.00006839927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009150843,0.00007337573,0.9821319,0.00005939909,0.000006688746,0.000003187746,0.0004609951,0.003611261,0.01244309,0.000006504073,0.000003008244,0.001109112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002228105,0.0002384337,0.9409673,0.000234169,0.00001796882,0.000004528139,0.00007006485,0.0008904929,0.05415957,0.0003832713,0.0005519104,0.0002542415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983442,0.0001006634,0.0009840516,0.00009995556,0.00002406321,0.0001525425,0.00001659844,0.00001189853,0.0002659729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993593,0.000185781,0.0002807623,0.000101755,0.000007099035,0.000002217392,0.000004441683,0.00000927464,0.00004935251],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04171648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4178221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01054851379238994,"score_gpt":0.2311097514339198,"score_spread":0.2205612376415299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}