{"id":"W2478766696","doi":"10.1002/nop2.61","title":"Rasch analysis of Stamps's Index of Work Satisfaction in nursing population","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nursing Open","topic":"Nursing education and management","field":"Nursing","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Rasch model; Reliability (semiconductor); Index (typography); Psychology; Job satisfaction; Sample (material); Item response theory; Applied psychology; Work (physics); Polytomous Rasch model; Population; Statistics; Psychometrics; Nursing; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics; Environmental health; Engineering; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006318078,0.0003659087,0.0006251694,0.003435473,0.0005829917,0.0007220199,0.0003798849,0.0003220197,0.003001157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02503673,0.0001544184,0.001446889,0.003894428,0.0004418864,0.000416939,0.0007184593,0.0005406732,0.0005846404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006488941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009436969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006520606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005168224,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944493,0.002747876,0.0004808429,0.0005207594,0.001558779,0.0002425605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854594,0.007203225,0.002211924,0.001838511,0.003081423,0.0002054994],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000322877,0.000117941,0.9212277,0.0001337162,0.0004092781,0.0001027124,0.00204741,0.004434403,0.0006661523,0.001205968,0.001831857,0.06749994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001679878,0.0004734938,0.9771118,0.00004772163,0.00009037356,0.0001462112,0.0009554694,0.0184995,0.0004129032,0.0009973769,0.001222004,0.00002633705],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973123,0.0002057658,0.02136842,0.0001119895,0.00004472385,0.0003063999,0.001374415,0.000219284,0.003245923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941247,0.00004725256,0.00451271,0.00001174233,0.00001116861,0.0002214965,0.0006395853,0.00001717754,0.0004141751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006520606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03341359,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02519308216818114,"score_gpt":0.3685820406855377,"score_spread":0.3433889585173566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}