{"id":"W2479480904","doi":"","title":"Three Case Studies in Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Right to health; Universal coverage; Universal design; Path (computing); Public economics; Face (sociological concept); Health equity; Process (computing); Realization (probability); Politics; Business; Actuarial science; Health policy; Economics; Health care; Political science; Computer science; Economic growth; Sociology; Law; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01866449,0.000691025,0.0005074317,0.00206985,0.008911228,0.004824936,0.002018729,0.009806505,0.009433919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03780574,0.0004603827,0.001334269,0.003067335,0.004571526,0.002876637,0.005402876,0.004873037,0.000485537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01054686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00563875,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02525145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05353064,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9804079,0.01612353,0.0003791636,0.0003790031,0.001060446,0.001650026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638946,0.03120839,0.001124889,0.0007753475,0.00144293,0.001553764],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005774108,0.001640361,0.008043127,0.0008470489,0.0001205581,0.01549611,0.01694083,0.02266824,0.0005689442,0.8468668,0.03412902,0.05210144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010445,0.001148452,0.00806679,0.002416,0.0002174535,0.008872128,0.06708434,0.02934108,0.003145907,0.4910201,0.3873724,0.0002708177],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3300631,0.01621634,0.1255884,0.0700599,0.001461816,0.006671112,0.001241481,0.0001176736,0.4485801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8456798,0.004720445,0.1119732,0.006012113,0.000163891,0.004316579,0.0002337487,0.00003418765,0.02686598],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02525145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09870845,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5027967564049577,"score_gpt":0.4313996485154853,"score_spread":0.07139710788947234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}