{"id":"W2481133596","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2016-0157","title":"Assisted lodgepole pine regeneration on reclamation sites using logging slash as both a mulch and natural seed source","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Seedling growth and survival studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Canada","keywords":"Mulch; Pinus contorta; Environmental science; Slash (logging); Seedling; Agronomy; Slash Pine; Land reclamation; Forestry; Botany; Pinus <genus>; Biology; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001140022,0.0000912219,0.0001323561,0.0002516202,0.0005482655,0.0001039621,0.0001468982,0.00005424327,0.0001149956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008543123,0.00006214593,0.00003691928,0.0002577835,0.0002834625,0.0002354213,0.00003632814,0.0002403799,0.00003688406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005642878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001725975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01346241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1005463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985773,0.0001677006,0.0002176594,0.0001551526,0.0004641969,0.0004179702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991282,0.0002109801,0.00009093492,0.0001036842,0.00006844747,0.0003977089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006910709,0.00001193291,0.9447895,0.000009424732,0.00002277858,0.00006378966,0.0004813767,0.000697162,0.04059479,0.0001459905,0.001454512,0.0116596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000521244,0.0002446639,0.9906306,0.0001686194,0.00000700784,0.0001204916,0.0001899527,0.001546732,0.002791073,0.0007912701,0.002861075,0.000127219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995865,0.0002825588,0.0002539778,0.002287198,0.0001147846,0.00009236181,0.00000173065,0.000004174969,0.00109823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983712,0.00002839923,0.000296147,0.00008910834,0.000145962,0.000001164307,0.000001301208,0.00001123558,0.0010555],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08708385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993107,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05401611941223539,"score_gpt":0.3025209725527658,"score_spread":0.2485048531405304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}