{"id":"W2481377080","doi":"10.1007/s10544-016-0085-8","title":"Design of optimal electrode geometries for dielectrophoresis using fitness based on simplified particle trajectories","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biomedical Microdevices","topic":"Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dielectrophoresis; Electrode; Electric field; Particle (ecology); Materials science; Sorting; Electrode array; Nanotechnology; Mechanics; Microfluidics; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002306096,0.0005542057,0.000560563,0.0003823297,0.0002209556,0.000575684,0.0004515944,0.0005578102,0.0007704759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007335921,0.0003856794,0.0002859715,0.0002214098,0.0002935668,0.0004050139,0.000328079,0.0002347928,0.0002438735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004953999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000421563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005037099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001109156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999001,0.00002184748,0.000007517437,0.00002610002,0.00002805938,0.0000164624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998253,0.00006968118,0.00003139289,0.0000159934,0.00004461791,0.00001311918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001214476,0.000109497,0.001036574,0.0002089845,0.00003934571,0.0002041923,0.00008764012,0.6397999,0.2909597,0.01368366,0.0007930952,0.05295609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002806792,0.0001427176,0.0007657096,0.00001265751,0.00001711236,0.00006215831,0.00002771527,0.9473413,0.04790438,0.002169761,0.001507215,0.00002120135],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2674102,0.0005700365,0.7233313,0.0002279687,0.00006623862,0.0001428657,0.0001022376,0.0004452658,0.007703918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7896591,0.0003399153,0.2084407,0.00004176609,0.000009515713,0.000155948,0.00007799331,0.0000658939,0.001209224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0007704759,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003594398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02606607814544088,"score_gpt":0.2432515448469847,"score_spread":0.2171854667015439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}