{"id":"W2483300814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002","title":"Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Payment; Economics; Stylized fact; Dictator game; Ecosystem services; Animal ecology; Public economics; Tanzania; Sample (material); Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Ecosystem; Microeconomics; Ecology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Finance; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002497139,0.0001261311,0.0001891058,0.00004444109,0.0004258928,0.00009326512,0.0001787247,0.0001232725,0.0006094842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005868443,0.000103346,0.00004622992,0.00004547198,0.0006857625,0.0006042767,0.0001736866,0.00004887702,0.00009733783],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008546444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001492817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002512468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002823748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989957,0.00006437722,0.0002700992,0.0003449661,0.00005400456,0.0002708308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987647,0.0008397764,0.0001293772,0.0001023074,0.00003063753,0.0001332234],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004606463,0.0001227516,0.7089156,8.654396e-7,0.00002169589,0.000001740454,0.00201136,0.000007227641,0.009865638,0.2772404,0.0006928887,0.001073757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008843904,0.0002709268,0.9284179,0.00004052257,0.00001138523,0.000001428365,0.003202878,0.0001159324,0.00819925,0.04658092,0.01175758,0.0005169154],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826792,0.0001628665,0.00002171237,0.01115027,0.0002035639,0.0002114285,0.00003015808,0.00005462557,0.005486127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969429,0.0004540243,0.000840643,0.0009061769,0.0003368258,0.00005510465,0.000003917151,0.000008791292,0.0004516169],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2306595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6673424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07841829704190881,"score_gpt":0.3416995561109292,"score_spread":0.2632812590690204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}