{"id":"W2483300814","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.002","title":"Forest conservation policy and motivational crowding: Experimental evidence from Tanzania","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta; Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","keywords":"Crowding out; Incentive; Crowding; Payment; Economics; Stylized fact; Dictator game; Ecosystem services; Animal ecology; Public economics; Tanzania; Sample (material); Natural resource economics; Business; Socioeconomics; Ecosystem; Microeconomics; Ecology; Psychology; Monetary economics; Finance; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001707338,0.0003243097,0.0002839659,0.0003516897,0.0009004449,0.0005765329,0.0003507372,0.0005729683,0.008158764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005545137,0.0001950724,0.0001602457,0.0003112348,0.00132397,0.0003541246,0.0005088967,0.0005162553,0.000283718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000609714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005441775,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01022647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02045746,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996661,0.0002102238,0.00001304357,0.00003265922,0.00002379206,0.00005418238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925495,0.004846934,0.001526696,0.0005977743,0.000162883,0.0003160566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02368147,0.03868862,0.7022706,0.001247066,0.0007925219,0.001498042,0.01385153,0.01107694,0.05779829,0.03036718,0.007326405,0.1114013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001763466,0.005749919,0.9593565,0.0002219646,0.0003878226,0.0002157099,0.007447374,0.007613956,0.003788035,0.009989409,0.003401514,0.00006423093],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9987772,0.00005563746,0.00009284648,0.0001084779,0.000002772529,0.000009024468,0.00002480748,0.000001768,0.0009274511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993232,0.0000587335,0.0001821709,0.00004743053,0.000003317729,0.00001952681,0.00001965848,0.000001228452,0.0003447689],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01022647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0272938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07841829704190881,"score_gpt":0.3416995561109292,"score_spread":0.2632812590690204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}