{"id":"W2483478044","doi":"10.1484/m.sem-eb.3.3773","title":"Ælfric’s Manuscript of Paul the Deacon’s Homiliary: A Provisional Analysis","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Studies in the early Middle Ages","topic":"Medieval Literature and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Homily; Eleventh; Quarter (Canadian coin); History; Old English; Scholarship; Rhetoric; Classics; Style (visual arts); Interpretation (philosophy); Literature; Art; Philosophy; Theology; Archaeology; Linguistics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001412679,0.0003852972,0.0002702536,0.00229848,0.005483564,0.004190543,0.0005672727,0.001041588,0.009250857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005189034,0.0001721889,0.000146335,0.002060618,0.004211087,0.002398041,0.002125505,0.002126565,0.001953793],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004828198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002292713,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01355741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02533195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988871,0.000369863,0.00005418397,0.0001392067,0.0004359373,0.0001136755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985301,0.000662133,0.00008696319,0.0001047029,0.0005310337,0.00008492147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004458047,0.00001794994,0.001040736,0.0002999653,0.000008853181,0.0004029886,0.03436177,0.0001017595,0.0003093154,0.4424437,0.4836014,0.03736709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.517869e-7,0.000004541584,0.0006284069,0.0001548067,0.00000150882,0.00009407989,0.002975197,0.00002344886,0.0001114465,0.003023884,0.9929771,0.000004651218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03202819,0.0525502,0.0060736,0.08522978,0.01873772,0.0001599082,0.001382907,0.0001755883,0.803662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4598841,0.02572534,0.003258647,0.01317952,0.007881779,0.0001641044,0.001117655,0.0006069576,0.4881819],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01355741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0350312,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1440392504621489,"score_gpt":0.2846316398560084,"score_spread":0.1405923893938596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}