{"id":"W2483604105","doi":"10.1364/ao.55.005772","title":"Bayesian approach to the design of chemical species tomography experiments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Optics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"A priori and a posteriori; Computer science; Path (computing); Tomography; Bayesian probability; Algorithm; Covariance; Iterative reconstruction; Covariance matrix; Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Optics; Statistics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004270365,0.0001114775,0.0001742731,0.0001576208,0.00008213189,0.00010543,0.00090737,0.0000488476,0.000195803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006962626,0.00005048763,0.0000722796,0.0008363683,0.0001615629,0.00006363925,0.0001034712,0.00003886102,0.0001593552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002545044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004087673,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.030332e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.688276e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967798,0.00008840252,0.0004525463,0.0003848236,0.002078314,0.0002160848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998203,0.0005873456,0.0001492415,0.0007093941,0.0002595258,0.00009146781],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001259128,0.0001860129,0.0004508833,0.000002159672,0.00003237326,1.319981e-7,0.002200695,0.0009806757,0.8664195,0.05957399,0.04290778,0.02711989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001008298,0.00007576849,0.001038831,0.000018262,0.00003778587,0.000001132168,0.002890591,0.007514428,0.9287822,0.0474792,0.01080402,0.0003495347],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02493646,0.0000208168,0.9281189,0.000559949,0.0003055954,0.0006736129,0.000005343059,0.00002134031,0.045358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674355,0.000001132811,0.03133658,0.0001211624,0.00008532058,0.00005463213,0.000001414415,0.000006723726,0.0009575053],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.942499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2143905,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2700666714982641,"score_gpt":0.3585269224163342,"score_spread":0.08846025091807008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}