{"id":"W2483827338","doi":"10.5539/jmr.v8n4p40","title":"Useful Numerical Statistics of Some Response Surface Methodology Designs","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mathematics Research","topic":"Optimal Experimental Design Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Plackett–Burman design; Fractional factorial design; Response surface methodology; Optimality criterion; Factorial experiment; Order (exchange); Optimal design; Mathematical optimization; Surface (topology); Factorial; Hypercube; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1186043,0.0001627633,0.000925904,0.0008498852,0.0001023089,0.0001042957,0.001774019,0.0001499526,0.00111683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1261465,0.00008651276,0.0002055712,0.0009392386,0.0006860956,0.0004317609,0.0003753754,0.0004922372,0.000261435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000192751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006384687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004393577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.325352e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9762204,0.01491691,0.002387335,0.0003034562,0.005586289,0.0005856116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8813098,0.1140967,0.001016651,0.0006795098,0.002590626,0.0003067143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001798615,0.0005202657,0.0004397558,0.00002665792,0.00007094226,0.0001298382,0.001664667,0.00008776464,0.9575796,0.01894265,0.01146592,0.007273306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001130008,0.002754692,0.001180216,0.0001595652,0.00002026734,0.0003371086,0.00306636,0.001280028,0.4443863,0.5436291,0.001872731,0.0001837066],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3025439,0.0002207972,0.6957763,0.0009094996,0.0001896826,0.0001471278,0.0000261086,0.000004522546,0.0001820534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1829563,0.00006256538,0.8149787,0.00001811261,0.00006001736,0.000001550802,5.749881e-8,0.0000248087,0.001897889],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5246864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997963,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7972484735417239,"score_gpt":0.6384052529672962,"score_spread":0.1588432205744277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}