{"id":"W2485141716","doi":"10.1177/1468018116658776","title":"Living with insecurity: Food security, resilience, and the World Food Programme (WFP)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Social Policy","topic":"Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Food security; Nexus (standard); Resilience (materials science); Context (archaeology); Food systems; Politics; Political science; Food insecurity; Development economics; Economic growth; Psychological resilience; Human security; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002777876,0.0002655813,0.0001639688,0.001359831,0.003867054,0.004360991,0.0004360402,0.002296697,0.005032736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003054323,0.0001077853,0.0001715483,0.001545227,0.01373393,0.005445816,0.006228629,0.003969124,0.0003385966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003604245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006895614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008281015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01567428,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983585,0.00107021,0.00003206937,0.00006872344,0.0001542854,0.0003162994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976155,0.001104691,0.0003079525,0.00004873264,0.0001439547,0.0007793661],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000261711,0.0001617533,0.008277005,0.0003264532,0.00001088678,0.0006807186,0.05786936,0.0003760338,0.0001132405,0.7716574,0.05101252,0.1094885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001185489,0.00008747887,0.01938171,0.003688114,0.00001061881,0.001116174,0.1966299,0.0006182014,0.0001443107,0.3660231,0.4122401,0.00004846861],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07331747,0.0514643,0.001975403,0.6160382,0.001649971,0.00004743832,0.00009232036,0.00002856457,0.2553864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9055181,0.05391202,0.001548033,0.02310552,0.001053591,0.0001113692,0.00006221367,0.0000167781,0.01467246],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008281015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02615076,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07882698920216186,"score_gpt":0.4173647341924891,"score_spread":0.3385377449903272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}